No credit check · No monthly payments · Lose your case, owe nothing Call or text a specialist: (323) 366-8083

HomeFAQIs it safe?

Is pre-settlement funding safe? An honest answer.

If you have been reading about this online, you have seen the criticism. Much of it is fair. We would rather engage with it than write around it, because you are going to find it anyway and a company that pretends it does not exist has told you something about itself.

The short version

The product is safe in one specific and important sense: on a genuine non-recourse contract you cannot end up owing money you do not have, because if the case recovers nothing you owe nothing. Your house, your wages and your credit are not exposed — which is the practical consequence of why this is not legally a loan.

It is risky in a different sense, and this is the one that matters. It is expensive, the cost grows with time, and cases take longer than anyone expects. People are hurt by this product not by defaulting but by watching an advance consume most of a settlement they waited three years for.

What is true in the criticism

Four things, and we are not going to soften them.

  • It is expensive relative to conventional credit. It is priced against the possibility of recovering nothing at all, which is a real possibility, and that risk has to be priced somewhere. That explains the cost; it does not make it small.
  • Compounding on a long case is brutal. When charges are applied to a balance that already includes prior charges, the total accelerates rather than growing in a straight line. Over a three or four year case that difference is enormous, and it is the single most common reason people end up feeling misled.
  • Stacking is genuinely dangerous. Two or three advances from different companies on one claim can approach or exceed what is left after the attorney's fee and the medical liens. People have reached the end of a successful case with almost nothing.
  • Some companies in this industry behave badly. Opaque terms, payoff figures nobody will put in writing, pressure to take more than you asked for. That is a real pattern and it is why the criticism exists.

What changed in California

The California Consumer Legal Funding Act now sets rules for contracts it governs. It is not a rate cap, and anyone telling you California caps what funders can charge is wrong. What it does is force the terms into the open and prohibit specific conduct. General information, not legal advice — your attorney is the one to ask about your contract.

  • The numbers go on page one — the amount funded, itemised one-time charges, the maximum total that can be assigned, and a dated repayment schedule.
  • Repayment is set as amounts at intervals, not as a percentage of whatever you eventually recover.
  • Charges stop accruing after 36 months on a covered contract, which is the direct answer to the runaway-balance problem.
  • Five business days to cancel after funding, without penalty, if you return the money.
  • Ten specific prohibited acts, including referral fees in either direction, steering you to a particular attorney, taking any decision-making rights over your claim, conditioning funding on you firing your lawyer, and funding over an undisclosed prior assignment.
  • Real remedies. A violation can terminate the contract automatically and expose the company to statutory damages, actual damages, costs and fees, and injunctive relief.

That last point is the one to hold on to. A rule with a remedy attached is a rule that changes behaviour.

When funding is a bad idea

We would rather lose the transaction than have you in a contract you resent. Do not take an advance if:

  • Your case is close to resolving. Paying for a few weeks almost never makes sense.
  • Your attorney says the liens will eat it. They can see the whole picture. Believe them.
  • You have a cheaper option. Family, a payment plan with a provider, a hardship program, or an employer advance all beat this. Genuinely.
  • You want it for something you can postpone. This exists for rent, food, keeping the lights on and keeping a car you need for work. Not for convenience.
  • Nobody will put the payoff in writing. Walk away. From us too.
  • You already have advances stacked on the claim. Adding another is usually the wrong move — a buyout may be, but that is a different conversation and it is not always the answer either.

When it is worth it

One situation dominates, and it is the reason this industry exists at all: you cannot wait, so you take a low offer.

Insurers are not unaware of this. Delay is a negotiating position when the person on the other side is choosing between holding out and making rent. If an advance lets you decline an offer that undervalues your claim, it can pay for itself several times over. If it merely makes the wait more comfortable, it will not.

The other case is a hard deadline you cannot recover from — an eviction, a repossession of the car you need to get to work, a medical procedure you are postponing because of cost. Losing any of those costs more than the funding does.

How to tell a good funder from a bad one

  1. They put total payoff figures at several settlement dates in writing, before you sign.
  2. They tell you whether charges are simple or compounding without being pressed.
  3. They talk to your attorney rather than working around them.
  4. They will tell you not to do it. If a company has never talked someone out of funding, ask yourself why.
  5. They do not pressure you to take more than you asked for.
  6. They do not rush you past the cancellation window.

Hold us to all six.

Related

Read these before deciding

Your case takes time. Your bills don't wait.

Apply in about two minutes. We contact your attorney, review the case, and if you're approved you can have funds the same day. No credit check, no monthly payments, and if you lose, you owe us nothing.

Call or text us?

(323) 366-8083

Texts are usually answered within minutes during business hours.
Monday–Friday 8am–8pm PST · Saturday/Sunday 9am–5pm PST